Kristina Paskauskas vs Sasha Natalie Chimedza Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 12:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Paskauskas vs S. Natalie Chimedza

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ZIM
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paskauskas 1 - 0 Chimedza
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kristina Paskauskas winning 2 and Sasha Natalie Chimedza winning 0. The last match between Kristina Paskauskas and Sasha Natalie Chimedza was at the W15 Monastir, 04-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Kristina Paskauskas getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paskauskas | 1 |
| Chimedza | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Monastir(06-04-25)
K. Paskauskas vs S. N. Chimedza H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.69% (60-44) | Career Total W/L | 48.72% (19-20) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Paskauskas vs S. N. Chimedza Match Preview:
- In recent months, Chimedza has won 34.55% of points on their second serve, whereas Paskauskas has a slightly better performance at 36.96%. Is this an edge for Paskauskas? Marginally, yes.
- Chimedza excels in returning second serves, securing 56.92% of points compared to Paskauskas's 49.02%. This suggests Chimedza may have an advantage in return games.
- For first serve returns, the difference is negligible, with Chimedza at 32.54% and Paskauskas at 32.84%. Is this enough to favor one player? Not significantly.
- Under pressure, Paskauskas outperforms Chimedza by saving 40% of breakpoints, while Chimedza saves 34.78%. This could suggest Paskauskas is more resilient in crucial moments.
- Paskauskas has a higher overall match win rate in the past year (68.18%) compared to Chimedza’s 60%. Does this indicate better form? Likely, yes.
- When it comes to surface preference, both have played their best on indoor hard courts, with Paskauskas having a strong win rate of 70%, while Chimedza’s preference and performance are less distinct.
- Considering the tournament levels, both players compete frequently in $10K events, but Paskauskas has a slightly superior win percentage in these tournaments.
- Chimedza’s past opponents have had a higher average rank (46.3) compared to Paskauskas (358.59), indicating Chimedza might have faced tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Paskauskas has an impeccable record, winning all in the last year, whereas Chimedza has only managed to win half. Could this be crucial if the match reaches a decider? Absolutely.
- Chimedza is better at converting break points at 45%, significantly higher than Paskauskas's 33.33%. This might give Chimedza an edge during critical points.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
Recent stats highlight some clear advantages for both competitors. While Chimedza shows strength in returning serves and converting breakpoints, Paskauskas has shown resilience under pressure and a slightly superior win rate in recent matches.
Regarding match experience, Chimedza has faced higher-ranked opponents, which could have prepared them for tougher matches. However, Paskauskas’s consistent performance in deciding sets indicates mental toughness and the ability to serve out crucial situations.
With Paskauskas's slight edge in second serve points and their compelling performance in pressure-filled moments, they are positioned as the favorite to win this upcoming match.
Kristina Paskauskas vs Sasha Natalie Chimedza Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Paskauskas vs S. N. Chimedza H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:14:47 | Average Match Time | 1:14:47 |
| 60% (27/45) | 1st Serve % | 69% (35/51) |
| 81% (22/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (17/35) |
| 50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 55% (28/51) | Return Points Win % | 31% (14/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Paskauskas Recent Matches Played
S. N. Chimedza Recent Matches Played

K. Paskauskas vs S. N. Chimedza Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.69% (60/44) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 56.41% (132/102) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.89% (44/46) |
| 52.64% (1137/1023) | Games Win/Loss | 48.48% (414/440) |
| 55.29% (47/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 66.67% (6/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 70.00% (7/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 241 | Aces Total | 21 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 385 | Total Double Faults | 45 |
| 1:26:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 409.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 89.92 |
| 64% (3507/5464) | 1st Serve % | 63% (726/1151) |
| 65% (2272/3507) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (410/726) |
| 42% (814/1957) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (164/425) |
| 48% (316/653) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (54/108) |
| 46% (2536/5569) | Return Points Win % | 42% (464/1111) |
| 46.67% (14/16) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 62.16% (46/28) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (17/17) |
| 58% (59/102) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (19/39) |
| 62% (13/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 54% (15/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 85% (66/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (21/18) |
| 15% (66/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (21/3) |
| 11% (38/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (18/1) |